Introduction
This study delves into the intricate connection between fashion and architecture, beginning with an analysis of the fashion system. It addresses three core questions:
- How do fashion and architecture interrelate?
- How can architecture leverage the principles of the fashion system?
- To what extent do fashion and architecture embody the concept of excess?
Guided by Barthes’ theoretical framework of the fashion system, the research systematically explores these questions. The first section examines Barthes’ perspective on the fashion system, providing a foundational understanding. The second section investigates how architecture engages with and is influenced by the fashion system, emphasizing its role within this context. Finally, the third section considers the concept of excess in both fields, tracing its historical roots and offering insights into its modern interpretations.
Roland Barthes: Unveiling the Connection Between Fashion and Architecture
Talking about fashion is incomplete without acknowledging Roland Barthes, a towering intellectual figure whose contributions to semiology, structuralism, critique, and fashion continue to influence contemporary thought. Born in France in 1915 to a military family, Barthes led a discrete yet impactful life, leaving behind a legacy that extends beyond his untimely death in the 20th century. Despite the constraints of this paper, which cannot fully encompass his extensive works, Barthes’ profound insights into mass culture and literature remain noteworthy.
Central to this study is Barthes’ concept of the fashion system, a framework he developed to explore the relationship between visual language and the tangible representation of clothing. Barthes’ understanding of fashion was shaped by personal experiences, including his upbringing by a single mother with a keen interest in fashion photography after his father’s death. This paper focuses on examining the interrelationship between fashion and architecture through the lens of Barthes’ fashion system.
The analysis begins with a concise exploration of the fashion system’s propositions. Barthes viewed signs as systems of expression, transcending conventional linguistic frameworks. In a 1967 interview, Barthes highlighted his realization that fashion sign systems could serve as a distinct analytical tool beyond traditional language structures.
According to Barthes, fashion imagery in magazines is a composite of three elements:
- The image (iconic representation of the garment),
- The text (verbal description accompanying the image), and
- The real garment (physical item characterized by its construction, such as seams and pleats).
Through these elements, Barthes illuminated how fashion communicates meaning beyond the visual, setting the stage for further exploration of its connections with architecture. This paper will trace the theoretical intersections of these two disciplines, guided by Barthes’ innovative ideas on signs and systems.
Bridging the Gap: The Dynamic Relationship Between Fashion and Architecture
Roland Barthes believed that language plays a decisive role in shaping perception, freezing the essence of fashion into rigid frameworks. He argued that written descriptions of garments in fashion publications, whether positive or negative, inherently influence the reader’s interpretation. To Barthes, the written representation of fashion refers only to the physical items—garments, shoes—but fails to capture the broader essence of fashion. For a comprehensive understanding, he proposed applying the concepts of the signifier and the signified, combining signification with connotation to define fashion. Ultimately, Barthes concluded that fashion is an abstract construct created by a system of signs, unrelated to the physical realities of clothing or individuals.
This perspective extends beyond fashion into other fields, notably architecture. The relationship between fashion and architecture can be explained through shared histories, processes, and purposes. Both disciplines have influenced one another significantly, evolving through cultural, social, and personal expressions. A historical analysis reveals that fashion and architecture, though serving different practical needs, are shaped by the same contextual factors of their respective eras.
Both fashion and architecture aim to address human needs—shelter and body protection—by creating spaces and structures from materials that are interpreted in two dimensions. Despite their differences in scale, proportions, and shapes, they share core principles. Over time, architects have adopted fashion techniques such as pleating, folding, and draping, while fashion designers have embraced architectural elements like volume and structure. This interplay has led to innovative, cross-disciplinary creations that challenge boundaries and open new possibilities.
A notable turning point in the synergy between fashion and architecture occurred in the 20th century, particularly during the 1980s. This period was marked by cultural diversity, individuality, and an urban nihilistic backdrop. The blending of disciplines during this era mirrored the Renaissance in its creative vigor, leading to the dissolution of boundaries and the rise of collaborative dialogues. Architects and designers began to share ideas, producing concepts that redefined both fields. This rich exchange of ideas continues to inspire and expand the potential of fashion and architecture as interconnected art forms.
The Evolution of Fashion and Architecture: Bridging Boundaries and Inspiring Creativity
The 1980s marked a transformative era in the representation of fashion and architecture, fueled by the media’s adoption of broader visual culture perspectives. Blueprint magazine, first published in 1982, was a groundbreaking platform that merged these two fields, dissolving their traditional boundaries (Lipstadt, 2000). This paved the way for deeper collaborations in the 1990s, as renowned architects and fashion designers engaged in exhibitions and discussions, exploring their intersections. Scholars like Packsoy and Yalçın argue that fashion and architecture share a symbiotic relationship, providing material and conceptual inspiration for one another.
Both disciplines are rooted in three-dimensional forms and spatial concepts, aligning them closely with fine and visual arts. Architecture’s spatiality inspires fashion, as seen in garments designed to interact with the contours of the human body, reflecting three-dimensionality in their construction (Riegelman, 2003). Fashion designers have often drawn upon architectural masterpieces, incorporating their themes, structures, and details into clothing designs.
Architecture Inspiring Fashion
Iconic architectural works have directly influenced fashion design. For instance, the Sydney Opera House, designed by John Utzon, inspired fashion creations that mimic its overlapping shell roof structure. Designers translated the Opera House’s orange-like overlapping forms into garments featuring layered sleeves and skirts, while the blue waters of Sydney Harbour inspired fabric colors (Ozezen, 2004). Similarly, structures like the Galata Tower and Safranbolu Houses have inspired fashion designs, showcasing how architecture’s visual language breathes life into wearable art.
Fashion Inspiring Architecture
The reverse is equally true: fashion has left its imprint on architectural innovations. OMA/Rem Koolhaas’s Seattle Central Library employs a wrapped mesh-like skin composed of diamond-shaped panes of glass, mimicking fabric textures such as fishnet stockings. The building’s form, characterized by pulled and pushed spaces to accommodate different functions, reflects a fabric-like design philosophy. Similarly, Greg Lynn’s Slavin House in Venice, California, integrates soap bubble-shaped windows made of interlocking plastic modules, reminiscent of Paco Rabanne’s 1960s dresses.
A Synergistic Future
This dynamic exchange between fashion and architecture has given rise to beautiful, functional, and commercially viable creations in both fields. Moreover, the cross-pollination has inspired other creative disciplines, such as art and jewelry making. The intersection of these two realms underscores their shared ability to redefine aesthetics, functionality, and cultural expression, proving that the dialogue between fashion and architecture is not just an exchange but a continuous evolution of creativity and innovation.
The Intersection of Fashion and Architecture: A Cultural and Historical Perspective
The relationship between fashion and architecture has undergone significant evolution, particularly in the modern era. Drawing from Roland Barthes’ (1990) concept of the “fashion system,” this relationship transcends mere functionality to embody broader cultural codes and aesthetic ideals. This interplay has redefined traditional boundaries, merging disciplines in ways that celebrate creativity and innovation.
The Influence of the Fashion System on Architecture
Barthes’ “fashion system” argues that fashion conveys a coded language independent of garments or individuals. In a similar vein, modern architecture incorporates elements of fashion, art, and design, dismantling rigid rules that once defined the field. As Varnelis (1998) notes, the presentation of architectural concepts through exhibitions, media, and symposia exemplifies the fusion of these disciplines.
Early architectural representation—through technical drawings and the eventual realization of structures—has evolved. Today, the processes behind architectural creation (e.g., material selection, design, and construction techniques) resonate with the iterative and expressive nature of fashion design. This parallel underscores the interconnectedness of these fields, which Barthes might suggest forms an “architectural system.”
Fashion and Architecture: Shared Histories and Economic Implications
Historically, both fashion and architecture have symbolized social status. During the pre-modern era, the aristocracy enjoyed exclusive access to high-fashion garments and architectural marvels, emphasizing class distinctions. Laver and Haye (1995) highlight that these fields established codes comprehensible only to their respective elite classes. Similarly, Stevens (1998) underscores the deliberate opulence of noble attire, designed to assert wealth and status.
Fashion trends, such as haute couture in Paris, were closely tied to class and exclusivity. These trends later influenced broader society, with the affluent adopting post-fashion styles. Architecture mirrored this dynamic, with kings and clergy commissioning grand structures that symbolized power and prestige, leaving commoners in simpler dwellings (Lipstadt, 2000).
Modernity and Blurred Boundaries
Modernity has altered the traditional structures of aristocracy and class distinctions but retains capitalism’s influence on fashion and architecture. The rise of the middle class has created a buffer between the elite and the working class, blurring boundaries while maintaining underlying socio-economic hierarchies.
Despite these changes, the two fields continue to intersect, offering mutual inspiration. This symbiotic relationship fosters innovation, pushing the boundaries of design and technology. For instance, iconic structures like the Sydney Opera House inspire fashion designs, while architectural projects such as OMA/Rem Koolhaas’s Seattle Central Library draw from the aesthetic and material qualities of fashion.
Implications for Education and Society
The fusion of fashion and architecture presents unique opportunities for students and professionals. It encourages interdisciplinary learning, promotes innovation, and highlights the importance of aesthetic and functional considerations in design. However, it also serves as a reminder of the socio-economic systems underpinning these fields, emphasizing the need to consider their impact on society.
References
Barthes, R. (1990). The Fashion System. California: University of California Press.
Barthes, R. (2012). Roland Barthes. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Daye, R. (2004). Costume designs inspired by architecture. Project for Apparel Design Course at Çukurova University Faculty of Fine Arts Textiles Department, 35×50 cm. Colored pencil and watercolor.
Fausch, D., Singley, P., El-Khoury, R., & Efrat, Z. (1994). Architecture: In Fashion. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Flimflek, Z. (2004). Costume designs inspired by architecture. Project for Apparel Design Course at Çukurova University Faculty of Fine Arts Textiles Department, 35×50 cm. Watercolor.
Horuzolu, R. (2004). Costume designs inspired by architecture. Project for Apparel Design Course at Çukurova University Faculty of Fine Arts Textiles Department, 35×50 cm. Colored pencil and watercolor.
Lipstadt, H. (2000). Theorizing the competition: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu as a challenge to architectural history. Thresholds, 21, 32–36.
Laver, J., & Haye, A. (1995). Costume and Fashion: A Concise History. London: Thames & Hudson.
Miles, G. (2008). Skin+Bones: Parallel Practices in Fashion and Architecture. Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA), Los Angeles.
Özezen, N. (2004). Costume designs inspired by architecture. Project for Apparel Design Course at Çukurova University Faculty of Fine Arts Textiles Department, 35×50 cm. Colored pencil and watercolor.
Paksoy, H., & Yacon, S. (n.d.). Architectural inspirations in fashion design. Turkey: Çukurova University.
Riegelman, N. (2003). 9 Heads: A Guide to Drawing Fashion (3rd ed.). Pasadena, California: 9 Heads Media in association with Art Center College of Design.
Stevens, G. (1998). The Favored Circle. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Varnelis, K. (1998). The education of the innocent eye. The Journal of Architectural Education, 51(4), 212–223.
